Ok, sure, I’m a bit biased, but here are some pointers as to why the Apple iPad is not going to be a huge success.

First off, “iPad”, really?!? What kind of name is that. I remember looking at early “renditions” of the fabled Apple Tablet with names including iSlate and iPad. At some point, there was a Borders survey that mentioned and iPad, and I immediately scoffed at the name.

For all this time, people were imagining some amazing device that would be somewhere in the field between smartphones and laptops, not just a huge iPod Touch.

Really, I don’t see why you would spend $499 or more on a device that basically does what an iPod does, but with a larger (multitouch) screen which is supposed to make reading book, browsing the web, and the such easier.

You could buy a netbook for a cheaper price and it would come with a keyboard as well as more functionality. Not to mention you could get one with a touchscreen as well.

Granted, the iPad does have some good points such as weighing 1.5 lbs and a 10 hour battery life, but really that is about it. Look at how stupid the device looks in Steve Job’s hands, being just a huge iPod:

You’ll be able to run all the iPhone/iPod apps on the iPad. Though there is still no multitasking, giving further reason as to the little benefit between the iPod Touch and iPad.

People who want to have an excellent on the go reading device should get a Kindle (which gives you a very paper-life experience), those who want to get a great multimedia device, get something along the lines of an iPod (I’m only saying this to prove a point), if you want to have a cheap portable computing device, get a netbook. So tell me, why would you get an iPad?

So, $499 for the 16GB model, $599 for the 32 GB model, and $699 for the 64GB model. 3G adds $130. The Wi-Fi only model will come out in 60 days, and the 3G one in 90 days.

Images from Apple.Com and Engadget.com

Gizmodo article: http://i.gizmodo.com/5458292/apple-ipad-everything-you-need-to-know

Gizmodo has a great guide to all the rumors that sprung up regarding the Apple Tablet:http://gizmodo.com/5434566/the-exhaustive-guide-to-apple-tablet-rumors

Specs: http://www.apple.com/ipad/specs/

Engadget Article: http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/27/the-apple-ipad/

Engadget Apple Tablet History: http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/26/the-apple-tablet-a-complete-history-supposedly/

The Standard (agrees with me!): http://www.thestandard.com/news/2010/01/27/early-ipad-reaction-its-just-giant-ipod-touch?source=nlt_weekly

Well, it is, sort of. It is what you would call a “watered down iPhone”. It looks like one, acts like one, but isn’t one. It’s the iPod Touch. I know, I know, It looks JUST like the iPhone, without all the extra menu buttons and a speaker above the screen. Also, keep note that this “iPhone” has a 3.5 mm jack, so you can use your normal headphones without an adapter. Today, during the Apple conference they announced the new iPods, which includes updated versions of the Shuffle, Nano, and “Classic” (In other words, the original iPod). The iPod touch will sell in two versions: an 8GB one for $299.00 and 16GB one for $399.00.

The iPod Touch in its dock.

The Back and Side of the iPod Touch

The iPod Touch Box

Steve Jobs announcing the new iPods (Left to Right: Shuffle, Nano, Classic, Touch, iPhone)
Image courtesy of Cnet News

All other images courtesy of Apple Corporation.